Effect of Potassium Humate, Phosphorus and Copper on Onion Quantitative and Qualitative Yield

Karam. E. M. Nassar

Soil and Water and Environment Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, 12619 Egypt.

Hayam A. EL-Shaboury *

Soil and Water and Environment Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, 12619 Egypt.

Amany E. EL-Sonbaty

Soil and Water and Environment Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Giza, 12619 Egypt.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.


Abstract

Previous research has been limited regarding the combined impacts of copper and potassium humate under various phosphorus fertilization levels on onion crops. So,  a field trials were performed during  two successive winter seasons of 2021 - 2022 and 2022 - 2023 aiming to evaluate three levels of calcium superphosphate (representing 100 %, 75 % and 50 % of the phosphorus recommended dose) as main plot treatments, along with three levels of potassium humate soil addition ( 0.0 %, 1.0 % and 2.0 % ) as sub-plot treatments. Additionally, foliar spraying of copper was carried out at three different rates (0.0 %, 0.1 % and 0.2 %) as sub-subplot treatments. These factors were examined individually or in combination to assess their impact on onion performance, quantitative yield, and qualitative attributes. Firstly, in terms of the individual effect of phosphorus recommended dose (PRD), the application of 100% of PRD demonstrated superior impacts on onion growth performance, quantitative and qualitative yield compared to 75% and 50% of PRD, respectively. Secondly, focusing on the individual effect of soil addition of potassium humate, all parameters related to growth performance, quantitative and qualitative yield, such as bulb weight and diameter, neck diameter, marketable bulb yield, total dissolved solids (TDS), total sugar (%), carbohydrates, and crude protein, exhibited an increase with higher rates of added potassium humate. Thirdly, the values of all parameters studied increased as the rate of copper application increased, indicating a positive correlation between copper application and onion crop performance. Lastly, the combined treatment of 100% of PRD with 2.0% potassium humate and 0.2% copper recorded the highest values across all measured parameters. Additionally, the combined treatment of 75% of PRD with potassium humate at rates of 1.0% or 2.0%, along with copper at rates of 0.1% and 0.2%, outperformed the individual application of 100% PRD in terms of the measured parameters. Therefore, it can be concluded that the combined addition of potassium humate (as soil addition) and Cu (as foliar application) has a vital role in improving the quantitative and qualitative yield of the as well as raising the efficiency of phosphate fertilizers.

Keywords: Calcium superphosphate, Potassium humate, copper and onion plants


How to Cite

Nassar, K. E. M., EL-Shaboury, H. A., & EL-Sonbaty, A. E. (2024). Effect of Potassium Humate, Phosphorus and Copper on Onion Quantitative and Qualitative Yield. Asian Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 10(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajsspn/2024/v10i2268

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Richardson AE, Hocking PJ, Simpson RJ, George TS. Plant mechanisms to optimize access to soil phosphorus. Crop and Pasture Science. 2009;60(2):124-143.

El-Agrodi MW, Mosa AA, Elsherpiny MA. Inorganic phosphorus forms in alluvial and calcareous soils as affected by different phosphorus application levels and incubation periods. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering. 2011;2(12):1195-1206.‏

TiradoR, Allsopp M. Phosphorus in agriculture: problems and solutions. Greenpeace Research Laboratories Technical Report (Review). 2012;2.‏

Bindraban PS, Dimkpa CO, Pandey R. Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health. Biology and Fertility of Soils. 2020;56(3): 299-317.‏

He X, Augusto L, Goll DS, Ringeval B, Wang Y, Helfenstein J, Hou E. Global patterns and drivers of soil total phosphorus concentration. Earth System Science Data. 2021;13(12):5831-5846.

El-Naqma KA, Shabana M, El-Sherpiny MA. Irrigation with magnetically treated water on the efficiency of phosphorus fertilizers and improving the productivity of wheat plants grown on different soils. Asian Journal of Plant and Soil Sciences. 2022;370-383.

Mayhew L. Humic substances in biological agriculture. Rev ACRES. 2004;34(1-2):80-88.‏

Ghabbour EA, Davies G. (Eds.). Humic substances: structures, properties and uses. Woodhead Publishing; 2014.‏

El-Shaboury HA, Ewais MA. Response of onion plants productivity and quality to tow organic polymers under sustainable mineral fertilizers management. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering. 2020;11(10):593-600.‏‏

El-shamly AM, Parrey ZA, Gaafar ARZ, Siddiqui MH, Hussain S. Potassium humate and cobalt enhance peanut tolerance to water stress through regulation of proline, antioxidants, and maintenance of nutrient homeostasis. Scientific Reports. 2024;14(1):1625.‏

Zhu Q, Zhang M, Ma Q. Copper-based foliar fertilizer and controlled release urea improved soil chemical properties, plant growth and yield of tomato. Scientia horticulturae. 2012;143:109-114.‏

Habiba U, Ali S, Farid M, Shakoor MB, Rizwan M, Ibrahim M, Ali B. EDTA enhanced plant growth, antioxidant defense system, and phytoextraction of copper by Brassica napus L. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015;22(2):1534-1544.‏

Adamuchio-Oliveira LG, Mazaro SM, Mógor G, Sant’Anna-Santos BF, Mógor ÁF. Chitosan associated with chelated copper applied on tomatoes: Enzymatic and anatomical changes related to plant defense responses. Scientia Horticulturae. 2020;271:109431.‏

El-Sherpiny MA, Kany MA, Sakara HM. Enhancement of growth and yield quality of onion plant via foliar application of bio-stimulants under different nitrogen sources. Journal of Global Agriculture and Ecology. 2022;13-24.‏

‏Marey RA, Elmasry HM. Vegetative growth, yield, and quality of onion as influenced by nitrogen rates and natural stimulators. Egyptian Journal of Soil Science. 2024;64(1):49-62.‏

Chakraborty AJ, Uddin TM, Zidan M, Redwan BM, Mitra S, Das R, Emran TB. Allium cepa: A Treasure of Bioactive Phytochemicals with Prospective Health Benefits. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine;2022.‏

Dane JH, Topp CG. (Eds.) Methods of soil analysis, Part 4: Physical methods. John Wiley & Sons. 2020;20.

Sparks DL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loeppert RH. (Eds.). Methods of soil analysis part 3: Chemical methods (Vol. 14). John Wiley & Sons. 2022;14.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. Statistical procedures for agricultural research”. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 1984;680.

Castelli F, Contillo R, Miceli F. Non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll content in four crop species. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sci. 1996;177: 275–283.

Costache MA, Campeanu GH, Neata G. Studies concerning the extraction of chlorophyll and total carotenoids from vegetables. Romanian Biotechnological Letters. 2012;17(5): 7702-7708.‏

Walinga I, Van Der Lee JJ, Houba VJ, Van Vark W, Novozamsky I. Plant analysis manual. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.‏

AOAC. ̋ Official Methods of Analysis ̏. 18th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, Method 04; 2000

Crecente-Campo J, Nunes-Damaceno M, Romero-Rodríguez MA, Vázquez-Odériz ML. Color, anthocyanin pigment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic compound determination in organic versus conventional strawberries (Fragaria× ananassa Duch, cv Selva). Journal of Food Composition and Analysis. 2012;28(1):23-30.‏

Anthon A, Barrett D. Modified method for the determination of pyruvic acid with di-nitrophenyl hydrazine in the assessment of onion pungency. J Sci. Food Agric., 2003;83: 1210-1213.